You shouldn't need a law degree to know who's actually acting on what you care about. CivAlign filters the noise and shows the actions — linked directly to the public record.
No signup required. Takes under a minute.
Built from official public records. Structured to remain non-partisan.
Best Match • Derived from your priorities + public record
A structured pipeline connecting your priorities to verifiable public record evidence.
Select issues and weight what matters most. No ideological labels — the system reflects your values, not platform-defined categories.
We analyze votes, bill sponsorship, committee influence, and legislative outcomes — mapped against your stated priorities.
Every score links to bill text and public sources. Assumptions are visible. Nothing is hidden in the methodology.
Most people aren't apathetic. They're overloaded. Congress introduces thousands of bills each session. Most never reach a vote. Power shows up in what gets stalled, amended, or quietly dropped.
CivAlign makes those hidden outcomes legible — so you can evaluate candidates by what they did, not what they said.
The information exists. The synthesis layer does not. Legislative activity exceeds any individual's practical capacity to monitor without dedicated infrastructure.
Committee holds, scheduling choices, and motions to table are documented in the public record but rarely surface in standard civic reporting.
Converting raw legislative records into personally relevant assessments requires time, knowledge, and analytical capacity most people don't have.
Most people have the motivation. They're missing the infrastructure. CivAlign translates the public record into something you can actually use — traceable, personalized, and free of editorial spin.
Scores are built around your priorities — not a generic party scorecard. Two people with different values get different results from the same public record.
Every result links to its source — bill text, vote record, committee action. No black-box conclusions. No editorial judgment embedded in the output.
Rankings reflect your own framework applied to public record data — not platform priorities, not algorithmic recommendations, not someone else's conclusions.
Lowers the cost of becoming a high-information voter. Structural tools — not messaging campaigns — are how civic capacity gets rebuilt at scale.
Alignment outputs are not summaries or opinions. Each score links directly to specific legislation, votes, and bill text from the public record.
You can inspect the source behind any conclusion the system produces.
CivAlign is being developed in structured phases, with a target of operational readiness aligned with the 2026 electoral calendar.
Alignment scoring and evidence traceability functional. Prototype operational and under active refinement.
Expanded issue coverage and broader candidate support. Public-facing release with documented methodology and verifiable outputs.
Platform hardening, performance scaling, and accessibility. Expanded civic partnerships and data coverage depth.
Ready for full national usage in the 2026 cycle. Infrastructure hardened for high-volume, time-sensitive public access.
Contributions support early-stage infrastructure and development. Funding determines speed to public release. CivAlign currently operates as a California sole proprietorship. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Direct contribution to foundational infrastructure development.
Contribute $10Supports core tooling, hosting, and initial data ingestion pipelines.
Contribute $25Funds model refinement and expanded public record data coverage.
Contribute $50Accelerates security configuration and platform architecture work.
Contribute $100CivAlign currently operates as a California sole proprietorship. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes. Nonprofit conversion is intended as infrastructure and capital allow.
Secure payment processing via Stripe.
Receive infrastructure updates, development milestones, and launch information. No marketing. No political content. Infrastructure updates only.
No. CivAlign is non-partisan and does not endorse, oppose, or affiliate with any political party or candidate. The platform's alignment methodology is applied uniformly across the political spectrum based solely on your defined priorities and public record data.
No. CivAlign currently operates as a California sole proprietorship. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes at this time. Nonprofit conversion is intended as infrastructure and capital allow. Contributors should consult a tax advisor regarding the treatment of contributions in their specific circumstances.
No. CivAlign does not coordinate with any political campaign, party organization, political action committee, or candidate. CivAlign does not make political contributions of any kind.
No. CivAlign is currently in active early-stage development. The operational prototype demonstrates core weighting and alignment logic, but is not a production system. Outputs will evolve as the underlying model and data infrastructure are refined. See the Prototype Disclaimer for full details.
Alignment scores are derived from your defined priority weights applied to indexed public legislative record data — including votes, bill sponsorships, committee actions, and other documented legislative activity. The methodology and analytical assumptions are documented. Every score can be traced to specific public record evidence.
You do. CivAlign does not apply ideological labels or editorial judgments to legislative activity. You define your own priority framework through the weighting interface, and the system applies that framework to the public record. Two people with different priorities will receive different alignment outputs from the same underlying data.
CivAlign uses publicly available legislative and governmental data sources, including official congressional records, Federal Election Commission disclosures, and other documented public records. Data sources are documented within the platform. The specific data pipeline is under active development.
Seeking an experienced full-stack infrastructure builder with strong familiarity in LLM systems, data ingestion pipelines, scalable architecture, and AI-assisted development workflows. This is an early-phase contributor role. Compensation structure to be defined as capital is secured.
Institutional mechanics — not ideology. This role exists to ensure CivAlign's scoring reflects how power actually operates inside Congress — not how it appears to operate from the outside.
What You Bring
CivAlign's differentiation depends on modeling procedural power accurately. Before scaling toward 2026, institutional realism is non-negotiable. We are building transparency infrastructure — that requires someone who has seen how power actually operates.